Question Pack — Humanitarian & NGO

Pack (fixed)

Field	Value
Respondents	Humanitarian organisations, multilaterals, NGOs, implementation intermediaries
Primary gates	Use cases · Counterparties · Delivery model · Adoption
Secondary gates	Regulation · Infrastructure · Cross-RFP handoffs

Assemble (fill before the interview)

Field	Value
Cluster
Use case (this play)
Play one-liner
Hypothesis status	hypothesized / desk-supported / revised
Desk claims to test
What would falsify this play
Respondent name / role
Access basis	Interviewed / Warm Access / Referred / Desk-Identified
Session goal	confirm / falsify / upgrade confidence
Date

Then run Interview Conduct opening. Keep every probe anchored to this play.

Run — primary gates

Use cases

• Is the failure behind this use case acute enough in this cluster that your organisation would consider a new rail — not just a demo?
• Have you evaluated blockchain or digital-asset tools for something like this play before? What was decided and why?
• Would Cardano-specific properties (deterministic settlement, credentials, public auditability) matter for this play, or would any compliant digital system suffice?

Counterparties

• Who inside your organisation can sponsor a pilot of this play (mandate + budget + decision rights)?
• Which government or regulator relationships are required before this play can proceed in this cluster?
• Which local partners do you already trust for last-mile delivery or beneficiary access on this play?

Delivery model

• Who would implement and operate a pilot of this play day-to-day — your team, a local integrator, a global vendor, or a consortium?
• What delivery capacity is missing locally that has killed or delayed similar projects?

Adoption

• What counts as real adoption for this play: recurring beneficiary payments, institutional dependency, audited workflow integration, or something else?
• Which “pilot” announcements near this play should be treated as weak signals?
• If an adoption signal is claimed: propose a CASS tier and evidence rationale.

Run — secondary gates

Regulation

• What compliance or donor constraints govern this play (payments, data, digital assets)?
• Where is the regulatory path unclear enough that you would not proceed without counsel?

Infrastructure

• What must exist before this play is credible: mobile reach, identity, off-ramp, offline capability, privacy?
• Which of those are unmet in this cluster?

Cross-RFP / adjacent issues

• Which blockers of this play are liquidity, wallet UX, or enterprise-compliance issues rather than regional entry strategy?

Capture (fill during / after)

Field	Value
Gates addressed
Play status after call	confirmed / revised / rejected / inconclusive
Counterparties named
Access basis updates
Regulatory certainty	Clear / Evolving / Uncertain
Adoption signal (if any)
Proposed CASS tier
CASS rationale
Referrals
Notes / ingest link