Question Pack — Public Sector
Pack (fixed)
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Respondents | Public-sector officials and former officials |
| Primary gates | Regions · Counterparties · Regulation · Use cases |
| Secondary gates | Delivery model · Adoption · Cross-RFP handoffs |
Assemble (fill before the interview)
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Cluster | |
| Use case (this play) | |
| Play one-liner | |
| Hypothesis status | hypothesized / desk-supported / revised |
| Desk claims to test | |
| What would falsify this play | |
| Respondent name / role | |
| Access basis | Interviewed / Warm Access / Referred / Desk-Identified |
| Session goal | confirm / falsify / upgrade confidence |
| Date |
Then run Interview Conduct opening. Keep every probe anchored to this play (cluster × use case above).
Run — primary gates
Regions
- Is the problem behind this use case acute enough in this cluster that institutions are actively seeking new tools — not only discussing them?
- Where in or near this cluster would you not recommend this kind of initiative right now, and why?
- Compared with peer countries or neighbouring clusters, is institutional readiness for this play higher or lower?
Use cases
- Does this use case have a live problem owner inside government today?
- Has this use case (or a close digital substitute) been tried before here — what failed or stalled?
- Would a public ledger / deterministic settlement / credentials actually change this problem — or would a conventional system suffice?
Counterparties
- Who can approve or commission a pilot for this play?
- Whose non-objection is required before that pilot can proceed (ministry, regulator, procurement, treasury)?
- What route exists for an external partner to reach those actors within 12–24 months?
- Which intermediaries (donors, multilaterals, local integrators) actually open doors for this play?
Regulation
- What licensing, data, or procurement rules would block or delay a pilot of this play?
- Is the current posture toward blockchain / digital assets Clear, Evolving, or Uncertain for this use case?
- Where would you insist local counsel be engaged before any commitment?
Run — secondary gates
Delivery model
- Who would build and operate a pilot for this play if approved — internal IT, preferred vendor, open tender, or donor-funded implementer?
- What capacity gaps would kill this play even if political will existed?
Adoption
- What would count as success for a pilot of this play in your institution?
- What “interest” signals around this play should outsiders treat as weak (events, MoUs, panels)?
- If an adoption signal is claimed: propose a CASS tier and evidence rationale.
Cross-RFP / adjacent issues
- Which blockers of this play are not regional-entry problems (stablecoin liquidity, wallet UX, enterprise compliance) and belong in other workstreams?
Capture (fill during / after)
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Gates addressed | |
| Play status after call | confirmed / revised / rejected / inconclusive |
| Counterparties named | |
| Access basis updates | |
| Regulatory certainty | Clear / Evolving / Uncertain |
| Adoption signal (if any) | |
| Proposed CASS tier | |
| CASS rationale | |
| Referrals | |
| Notes / ingest link |
Last updated on